<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nyolcadik fejezet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulocoelhoblog.com/2007/02/05/nyolcadik-fejezet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulocoelhoblog.com/2007/02/05/nyolcadik-fejezet/</link>
	<description>updated on Monday, Wednesday, Friday</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:29:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kis irenke</title>
		<link>http://paulocoelhoblog.com/2007/02/05/nyolcadik-fejezet/comment-page-1/#comment-517124</link>
		<dc:creator>kis irenke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hu.paulocoelhoblog.com/witch-of-portobello/05.02.2007/nyolcadik-fejezet/#comment-517124</guid>
		<description>borzalom, mikor tehetetlenul ki vagyunk téve a hazug ájtatatságnak, mikor ki kell állnunk embertársunk mellett akkor mindenki elhuzodik, magára hagyják , gyotrelmeiben kinlodik és szornyu gondolatok futnak át az agyán, rettenetes és megszégyenito, butasság és ostobaság  e cselekedet, nagyon  rossz érzés és megfogalmazhatatlan, amikor mindenki téged néz, te vagy a kor kozepén, és ugy érzed, hogy elhagyott a világ mindenki és még kozelebb huzod magadhoz a gyermeket, mintha valami védelmet gondolna, te véded őt ő véd téged, nagyon szomoru jelenet és jogos a kitorés, mindenki azt kapja amit megérdemel, igy igazságos ez irénke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>borzalom, mikor tehetetlenul ki vagyunk téve a hazug ájtatatságnak, mikor ki kell állnunk embertársunk mellett akkor mindenki elhuzodik, magára hagyják , gyotrelmeiben kinlodik és szornyu gondolatok futnak át az agyán, rettenetes és megszégyenito, butasság és ostobaság  e cselekedet, nagyon  rossz érzés és megfogalmazhatatlan, amikor mindenki téged néz, te vagy a kor kozepén, és ugy érzed, hogy elhagyott a világ mindenki és még kozelebb huzod magadhoz a gyermeket, mintha valami védelmet gondolna, te véded őt ő véd téged, nagyon szomoru jelenet és jogos a kitorés, mindenki azt kapja amit megérdemel, igy igazságos ez irénke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seeker</title>
		<link>http://paulocoelhoblog.com/2007/02/05/nyolcadik-fejezet/comment-page-1/#comment-517123</link>
		<dc:creator>Seeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hu.paulocoelhoblog.com/witch-of-portobello/05.02.2007/nyolcadik-fejezet/#comment-517123</guid>
		<description>So the next chapter is due today. I like it so far, I&#039;m afraid I&#039;ll have to buy the book once the onlne chapters run out. But I would still be happy to get an answer to my qwuestion above!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the next chapter is due today. I like it so far, I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;ll have to buy the book once the onlne chapters run out. But I would still be happy to get an answer to my qwuestion above!! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seeker</title>
		<link>http://paulocoelhoblog.com/2007/02/05/nyolcadik-fejezet/comment-page-1/#comment-517122</link>
		<dc:creator>Seeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 06:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hu.paulocoelhoblog.com/witch-of-portobello/05.02.2007/nyolcadik-fejezet/#comment-517122</guid>
		<description>Hi Danny. I agree with what you and the pope say; problem only is that Athena doesn&#039;t get remarried! And if she doesn&#039;t and while she doesn&#039;t she can still be admited to &quot;Eucharistic Communion&quot; can she not? That&#039;s how I understand both church practice and the text you quoted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Danny. I agree with what you and the pope say; problem only is that Athena doesn&#8217;t get remarried! And if she doesn&#8217;t and while she doesn&#8217;t she can still be admited to &#8220;Eucharistic Communion&#8221; can she not? That&#8217;s how I understand both church practice and the text you quoted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://paulocoelhoblog.com/2007/02/05/nyolcadik-fejezet/comment-page-1/#comment-517121</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hu.paulocoelhoblog.com/witch-of-portobello/05.02.2007/nyolcadik-fejezet/#comment-517121</guid>
		<description>But it&#039;s right.
John Paul II. said in Familiaris consortio: &quot;However, the Church reaffirms her practice, which is based upon Sacred Scripture, of not admitting to Eucharistic Communion divorced persons who have remarried. They are unable to be admitted thereto from the fact that their state and condition of life objectively contradict that union of love between Christ and the Church which is signified and effected by the Eucharist. Besides this, there is another special pastoral reason: if these people were admitted to the Eucharist, the faithful would be led into error and confusion regarding the Church&#039;s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage.&quot;
This text explains everything...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it&#8217;s right.<br />
John Paul II. said in Familiaris consortio: &#8220;However, the Church reaffirms her practice, which is based upon Sacred Scripture, of not admitting to Eucharistic Communion divorced persons who have remarried. They are unable to be admitted thereto from the fact that their state and condition of life objectively contradict that union of love between Christ and the Church which is signified and effected by the Eucharist. Besides this, there is another special pastoral reason: if these people were admitted to the Eucharist, the faithful would be led into error and confusion regarding the Church&#8217;s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage.&#8221;<br />
This text explains everything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seeker</title>
		<link>http://paulocoelhoblog.com/2007/02/05/nyolcadik-fejezet/comment-page-1/#comment-517120</link>
		<dc:creator>Seeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 06:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hu.paulocoelhoblog.com/witch-of-portobello/05.02.2007/nyolcadik-fejezet/#comment-517120</guid>
		<description>No no no! I think this is just wrong!% The Church really doesn&#039;t allow communion to people who got divorced but only if they got married again. Because the real church marriage can&#039;t be deleted and the state marriage is only a piece of paper tha church never accepted! So if there is state divorce then the church marriage still contiunes if they don&#039;t get married again! So just because she fot divorced her state marriage, Athena could continue to have the holy communion! I mean this is not right this thinking in the priest! Can anyone explain??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No no no! I think this is just wrong!% The Church really doesn&#8217;t allow communion to people who got divorced but only if they got married again. Because the real church marriage can&#8217;t be deleted and the state marriage is only a piece of paper tha church never accepted! So if there is state divorce then the church marriage still contiunes if they don&#8217;t get married again! So just because she fot divorced her state marriage, Athena could continue to have the holy communion! I mean this is not right this thinking in the priest! Can anyone explain??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

